ISMGenius gives you a foundational, rubric-aligned first-pass on every student draft — so you instantly know where each student sits across every criterion. You still do the marking. The AI just gives you a head start.
No account required for your first feedback. No credit card needed.
ISMGenius by the numbers
Assignments Analysed
Educators Registered
AI & Plagiarism Detections
Words of Feedback Generated
Queensland teachers face the same challenges every assessment cycle. Sound familiar?
Cross-referencing each criterion descriptor against 30+ student drafts is exhausting. The same feedback gets written over and over.
By draft 20, fatigue sets in. Early students get detailed feedback while later ones get less. Consistency suffers.
Without a first-pass overview, it's hard to know which students need the most attention before you dive into detailed marking.
The AI provides a foundational draft — you bring the professional judgement. Together, every student gets better feedback faster.
Get a class-wide first-pass of rubric-aligned feedback in minutes. Instantly see where every student sits across each criterion — so you know where to focus your expert attention.
See exactly what separates a student's current work from the next band up. The AI identifies specific gaps and provides targeted suggestions you can refine and share with students.
Set up classes and assignments with a single task sheet and ISMG. Batch upload student files and receive feedback for the entire class in one go — no need to process drafts one at a time.
After processing a class, get an overall assessment evaluation that highlights common strengths, where most students fell short, and what could be improved — ready to share with students as a class-wide debrief.
Leave notes and marking guidance for different sections of an assessment so the AI knows exactly how you want it marked. Fine-tune the context to match your expectations and teaching style.
Sentence-by-sentence analysis flags potential AI-generated content and plagiarism. Use the results as a starting point for further investigation — not as a final verdict.
Every student gets the same depth of rubric analysis. ISMGenius doesn't get tired at draft 25. Use it as a second set of eyes to maintain consistency across your entire class.
Student work stays private and is never made public or used to train or sell data. You stay in control and can delete submissions anytime.
ISMGenius fits into your existing marking workflow. No training required.
Upload the task-specific ISMG (PDF) for the assessment. Add any marking notes or section guidance to fine-tune the AI to your expectations.
Upload individual drafts or batch upload an entire class. The AI reads the rubric and each submission together.
In under 30 seconds per draft, receive a criterion-by-criterion breakdown with estimated bands, strengths, gaps, and improvement suggestions as a starting point for your review.
Use the AI's draft feedback as a foundation. Apply your professional judgement, adjust as needed, and share actionable suggestions with students or generate a whole-class summary.
Get an instant, rubric-aligned overview of where every student sits before you begin your detailed review. The AI gives you a starting point — you provide the final word.
Use ISMGenius as a second opinion when moderating. Compare your own assessment against the AI's criterion analysis to catch potential discrepancies and maintain consistency.
Run AI detection scans across student submissions as a preliminary screening tool. Use the results to identify work that may need further investigation — always paired with your professional judgement.
No AI detector is 100% accurate, and AI itself is changing constantly. Detection results should be used as a screening tool only — never as the sole basis for punishing a student or as a final verdict on academic integrity. Always pair detection results with your professional judgement and a conversation with the student.
We believe the best outcomes for educators and students come from working together proactively to understand the challenge of AI misuse and find strategies that reinforce the human value of education.
If AI detection flags a student's work, consider conducting a one-on-one formative assessment rather than jumping to conclusions. Meet with the student and ask them to:
This approach respects the student, gathers meaningful evidence, and turns a potentially adversarial situation into a learning opportunity.
Student-facing resource available
Share our Academic Integrity guide with your students. It explains what academic integrity means, how to use AI responsibly, and the consequences of misconduct — in language written for them.
Upload an ISMG rubric and a student draft. Get foundational, criterion-by-criterion feedback in seconds — completely free to try.
Try ISMGenius FreeNo account required for your first feedback. No credit card needed.