AI is changing how students study, but the rules of academic integrity haven't changed. Understand where the line is, how to stay on the right side of it, and how tools like ISMGenius are designed to help — not replace — your own work.
Academic integrity means being honest about your work. It means that what you submit is genuinely yours — your own ideas, your own analysis, your own writing. It is the foundation of fair assessment and the reason your qualifications have value.
Everything you submit must reflect your own thinking, analysis, and effort. Getting feedback is fine. Having someone — or something — do the work for you is not.
If your school asks what tools you used, be honest. Using an AI feedback tool to check your draft is not the same as using AI to write your draft — but both deserve transparency.
Assignments exist to help you learn. Skipping the process with AI might save time now, but it costs you the skills, knowledge, and confidence you need for exams, real-life work, and your future.
If you use ideas, data, or wording from another source — including AI-generated content — reference it properly. Unattributed use of anyone else's work is plagiarism.
AI tools are not inherently good or bad for academic integrity. What matters is how you use them. Here is a clear breakdown.
ISMGenius is fundamentally different from generative AI tools like ChatGPT. Here is why.
ISMGenius analyses work you have already written. It tells you how your draft aligns with your rubric criteria — strengths, gaps, and areas for improvement. The thinking and writing remain entirely yours.
Getting rubric-aligned feedback on your draft is conceptually the same as asking a tutor, parent, or peer to review your work before you submit. ISMGenius automates that review — it does not automate the work itself.
ISMGenius has built-in tools to scan your work for AI-generated patterns and plagiarism. You can check your own work before your teacher does, giving you the opportunity to revise anything that might be flagged.
The revision workflow is designed to help you submit multiple drafts and track your improvement over time. Each revision builds your skills rather than bypassing the learning process.
Schools and QCAA take academic integrity seriously. The consequences of submitting AI-generated work or plagiarised content are real.
You may receive zero for the entire assessment piece.
The incident may be recorded on your academic file, which can affect future references.
For senior assessments, serious cases can be escalated to QCAA for investigation.
Rebuilding trust with your teachers after academic misconduct takes time and consistent honest effort.
The Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority requires that all work submitted for assessment is authentically the student's own. This applies to internal assessments, external assessments, and any work that contributes to your final results. QCAA's position on AI is clear: using AI to generate content that you submit as your own work is a breach of academic integrity.
However, using AI tools for legitimate study support — such as receiving feedback on a draft, checking grammar, or understanding rubric criteria — is generally acceptable when it does not replace your own thinking and effort. Always check your school's specific AI policy, as rules may vary.
We have detailed guidance for teachers on AI detection, formative assessment strategies, and proactive approaches to reducing AI misuse in the classroom.
View Educator GuidanceUpload your draft and ISMG rubric. Get rubric-aligned feedback that helps you improve — without crossing any lines.
Get Your Feedback1 free feedback without an account. No credit card needed.