Use this feedback as study guidance and ensure your final submission follows your school's academic integrity and QCAA AI policy requirements. By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Upload a draft, the task sheet, and the ISMG your teacher will mark from. The tool reads the actual criteria and descriptors for that task and tells you, criterion by criterion, where your response currently sits and what specifically would move it up. You get an estimated mark, the strengths worth keeping, and a short list of changes ranked by how much they are worth.
Every criterion on your ISMG assessed separately, against its own descriptors rather than one overall impression.
Where the draft currently lands, so you can see whether you are arguing over a band boundary or a whole band.
What to fix first. Most drafts have one criterion carrying the loss, and it is rarely the one students expect.
Specific enough to act on tonight. Every note points at a criterion, names what is missing, and says what to do instead.
Example of the report format, using invented text
You identify three techniques but explain the effect of only one. The descriptor asks for analysis of how the techniques shape meaning. Naming them is the lower band.
Your judgement on the second source is well justified. Apply the same structure to the third and this criterion is there.
Paragraphs 4 and 6 each carry two arguments. Splitting them costs you nothing and directly addresses the "clear and coherent" descriptor.
Anything with a written ISMG behind it. The tool is strongest where the criteria are explicit, which covers most QCAA internal assessment.
English and Literature analytical responses, including the extension subjects. The most common single use.
Problem-solving and modelling tasks across Mathematical Methods, Specialist and General Maths.
Science research investigations and student experiments in Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Psychology.
Business, Economics and Legal Studies reports, and technical reports in Engineering and Digital Solutions.
Modern History, Study of Religion and Geography extended responses to stimulus.
Any internal assessment where a written ISMG sets out the criteria you are marked against.
You can, and for general writing advice it is fine. The difference is what it is measuring against. A general chatbot has no idea what an ISMG is for your task, so it tells you what good writing looks like in the abstract. Your teacher marks it against a specific set of criteria and descriptors on a specific sheet.
That gap is where marks go missing. A response can be well written and still sit mid-band because it names techniques instead of analysing their effect, or because it evaluates two sources when the descriptor asks for three. Generic advice will not catch either, because generic advice is not reading the marking guide your work is graded against.
The other difference is what happens to the work. This tool reads what you wrote. That distinction is also what keeps it on the right side of your school’s academic integrity policy.
Anyone with a draft and an ISMG, at the point where feedback can still change the outcome. Most useful about a week out, late enough that the draft is real and early enough that you can still act on what it says.
A rubric-aligned first pass across a set of drafts, so you know where each student sits before you start marking. See the draft feedback and marking tool for teachers.
"I was initially skeptical, but ISMGenius has been an absolute lifesaver. I tried it out for my Study of Religion IA2 assignment, and it explained the feedback in great detail, showing me exactly what I needed to do to improve using the ISMG. It worked so well that I now use it for all my assignments. I can’t recommend ISMGenius enough!"
Adam K
Year 12
"This site provides incredibly clear and targeted feedback for my assignments. The advice I've received on my past work has been spot on. Even the free version is packed with functionality and gives you everything you need. I highly recommend it!"
Patty H
Year 12
"This website has helped me greatly when evaluating my assignments and seeing where I need to improve. Before I found it, I got lost quite often with where I needed to improve so I could get the best mark, especially when teacher feedback is vague. It has helped me a lot."
Nicholas N
Year 12
"ISMGenius is so helpful when I need extra feedback on my assignments to improve them. Its so clear and direct with its feedback, and saves me so much time and stress! 100% recommend."
Ronan L
Year 12
Two things worth reading if you want more out of the feedback than a mark estimate.